Actress Track Ha Yeon’s company responds to highschool bullying allegations

It was beforehand reported that an unnamed actress was going through allegations of bullying at college, and rumors have since unfold that the report was in reference to actress Track Ha Yeon.

On April 2 KST, King Kong by Starship, Track Ha Yeon’s company, issued an announcement addressing allegations of bullying in colleges. They said, “As quickly as we acquired the preliminary report and realized the seriousness of the scenario, we contacted the informant to substantiate the details.” The company defined that regardless of their efforts to make clear the matter via letters and telephone calls, they didn’t obtain any response from the informant.

The allegations surfaced in a report on JTBC’s “Crim Thief” program that implicated an actor known as “S” who gained reputation for portraying the villain in a latest drama. In accordance with the report, the informant claimed that he was assaulted by actor “S” in August 2004 throughout his highschool years in Seokho-gu, Seoul.

The informant, who now resides in america, demanded an apology from Actor “S” for the previous incident. Nevertheless, the response acquired was relating to a doable dialogue with “S” in Los Angeles.

In response to those allegations, Track Ha Yoon’s company confirmed, “After checking the details with the actor in query, we confirmed that there was no contact with the informant and that the data offered is inaccurate.” They urged towards publishing unconfirmed details. And speculative stories on this difficulty.

See under for his or her full assertion:

” Welcome. That is King Kong from Starship.
We wish to specific our place relating to the stories relating to our actress Track Ha Yoon.
We realized the seriousness of this drawback and after receiving the preliminary report, we spoke with the reporter to substantiate the details. After that, we requested a gathering to confirm the correct details through Messenger, however the informant refused. We requested a telephone name however didn’t obtain a response.
On account of verifying the details with the perpetrator and relating to the allegations of the informant, now we have confirmed that now we have no contact with the informant and that each one the data talked about is inaccurate.
At present, reckless hypothesis and speculative content material are rife because of the whistleblower’s one-sided claims. Due to this fact, we sincerely request you to chorus from reporting unconfirmed details and hypothesis.”