Speedtest document: Apple C1 beats the Qualcomm modem when community speeds are low

Apple is also having any other M1 second – the brand new Apple silicon, the C1 modem on this case, is thrashing the silicon it got here to switch, Qualcomm’s 5G modem, no less than in some metrics. Ookla, the corporate in the back of the preferred Speedtest carrier, revealed a document that compares 5G speeds between the iPhone 16 (Snapdragon X71 modem) and the brand new iPhone 16e (Apple C1).

In abstract, the Qualcomm modem gives upper most sensible speeds, however the C1 did higher in circumstances the place community speeds have been gradual. Ookla’s take a look at covers the highest 3 carriers in the USA, AT&T, T-Cellular and Verizon, however here’s the total chart first.

Amongst customers experiencing deficient community speeds, the tenth percentile of all checks, the 16e edged out the 16 with 27.35Mbps vs. 16.66Mbps. It even has a small benefit within the median take a look at. It’s most effective within the ninetieth percentile – those getting excessive pace connections – when the Qualcomm-based telephone comes out on most sensible.

Here’s a per-carrier breakdown, which presentations that during circumstances of deficient community connectivity, the iPhone 16e outperforms the iPhone 16 around the board.

Alternatively, when the community speeds are just right, the iPhone 16 turns the tables at the 16e:

Apple is reportedly operating on a variant of the C1 with mmWave connectivity, however missing the speedier 5G taste didn’t harm the iPhone 16e a lot. mmWave protection is spotty even in the USA and in some international locations it’s nonexistent. As an alternative, Ookla’s effects have known a larger factor for the C1 modem.

T-Cellular customers were given the perfect downlink speeds whether or not they had the iPhone 16 or 16e. Alternatively, amongst T-Cellular subscribers, the ones with the 16e were given noticeably decrease speeds than the ones with an iPhone 16. Ookla attributes this to T-Cellular’s national rollout of 5G StandAlone (SA) and higher deployment of provider aggregation (CA).

There aren’t any reputable stats for the X71, however Qualcomm’s mid-range modems give a boost to 4-link CA for obtain, whilst the C1 tops out at 3. Curiously, Qualcomm’s modems additionally give a boost to uplink provider aggregation, while the C1 does now not. And but take a look at the add pace effects throughout all 3 carriers – the iPhone 16e handily beats its pricier sibling.

That is an outstanding first time out for Apple. In long run C1 variations and the C2, the corporate must center of attention on bettering 5G SA and provider aggregation give a boost to, which must spice up its high-end efficiency. mmWave give a boost to can be great, however wouldn’t make a lot of a distinction in a large number of areas.

Apple additionally claims that the C1 is the most productive 5G modem that has been used on an iPhone but. The iPhone 16e formally lasts 21 hours of video streaming, whilst the iPhone 16 lasts 18 hours. That is with a bigger battery (4,005mAh vs. 3,561mAh), regardless that. And to be truthful to Qualcomm, the X71 is older than the corporate’s present modems.

This isn’t the entire tale – Ookla says it’s operating on a extra detailed document that compares the entire iPhone 16 collection. This document ends with a teaser – it seems that, the iPhone 16 Professional Max beats the 16e in “maximum efficiency metrics”. The Professional Max makes use of the similar X71 modem, so the adaptation comes from in other places (the antennas, possibly?).

Supply

Apple iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16e