The Samsung Galaxy S25 formally went on sale this Friday, despite the fact that Samsung began delivery pre-orders early. However let’s shift our focal point clear of the S25 collection for a little bit and spot what else is in the market.
The Google Pixel 9 Professional XL is able to take at the S25 Extremely – particularly now that Samsung is deprioritizing the S Pen. The Pixel already has a top solution ultra-wide (48MP), along with a 48MP 113mm periscope and a 50MP major (1/1.31” sensor). The selfie digital camera were given a large improve to a 42MP sensor and a 17mm ultra-wide lens too.
The Pixel 9 Professional takes at the vanilla S25. It’s a little bit greater and fairly a little bit heavier (199g vs. 162g), however small Android flagships are laborious to return by way of. The excellent news is that the Pixel 9 Professional has the similar cameras because the Professional XL – that may’t be mentioned of the S25 and S25 Extremely. This provides the Google telephone a large merit in telephoto (48MP 113mm vs. 10MP 67mm), ultra-wide (48MP vs. 12MP) or even major cameras (each 50MP, however 1/1.31” vs. 1.56” sensors).
The Pixels have UWB, sure, even the small Professional, and reputable satellite tv for pc SOS improve (one thing the S25 collection would possibly have however isn’t energetic). And whilst it’s heavier, the Pixel 9 Professional has a bigger 4,700mAh battery (vs. 4,000mAh), which supplies it a rather higher Lively use rating (13:11h vs. 12:21h). There’s no excuse for the Tensor G4, despite the fact that, it’s a lot slower than the Snapdragon 8 Elite.
The Google Pixel 9 is similar measurement (and weight, sadly) because the Pixel 9 Professional. It has the similar chipset, similar major and ultra-wide cameras, similar battery. It lacks a telephoto lens, alternatively, and the 6.3” is a non-LTPO 1080p+ panel (so, a decrease solution than the Professional). And the UWB is long gone, in case you care about that type of factor. Nonetheless, it’s £150 inexpensive than the Professional, making it a excellent choice for people that don’t use the zoom serve as a lot.
You’ll be able to pass even inexpensive with the Pixel 8a. In spite of having a rather smaller 6.1” show, the thicker bezels make the 8a the similar measurement because the Pixel 9. And virtually the similar weight at 188g too. This fashion makes use of the older Tensor G3, which drops its Lively use rating to 11:25h (the smaller 4,492mAh battery additionally has an impact right here). The 8a is sort of part the cost of a Pixel 9, despite the fact that, so the value-for-money proposition remains to be fairly sturdy.
Chances are you’ll need to have a look at the Pixel 8 too – it’s equivalent {hardware} for the same value. Take a look at our Pixel 8 vs. 8a article for extra on why chances are you’ll need to believe the older flagship.
Google could also be competing within the horizontal foldable area with the Pixel 9 Professional Fold. It’s greater and heavier than the Z Fold6 and the Tensor G4 isn’t any fit for even the older Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The cameras are beautiful excellent with a 48MP major, 10.8MP 112mm (5x) periscope and 10.5MP ultra-wide.
For £100 lower than a Pixel 9, you’ll have the Xiaomi 14T Professional with an older however nonetheless top finish Dimensity 9300+ chipset. The 6.67” 1220p+ OLED show isn’t an LTPO panel, however it does have 12-bit colours and a 144Hz refresh price. Relating to cameras, we’re taking a look at a 50MP major (1/1.31”), 50MP 60mm (2.6x) telephoto and a 12MP ultra-wide. The 5,000mAh battery excels with 120W stressed out and 50W wi-fi charging, despite the fact that the 12:32h Lively use rating is excellent however now not spectacular.
The Poco X7 and X7 Professional each have 6.67” 12-bit OLED panels (120Hz, non-LTPO) and use nearly the similar cameras – 50MP major (1/1.95”) and 8MP ultra-wide (by no means thoughts the 2MP macro at the X7). The Professional fashion stands proud with a greater chipset (Dimensity 8400 Extremely vs. 7300 Extremely), quicker garage (UFS 4.0 vs. UFS 2.2) and higher water resistance (IP69 vs. IP68). It has a larger battery too (6,000mAh vs. 5,110mAh) with quicker charging (90W, 100% in 42 min vs. 45W, 100% in 52 min).
We might get a fee from qualifying gross sales.
gsmarena.com





















You must be logged in to post a comment Login